Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Federal Reserve’ Category

The answer to the title above is simple; constant population growth equals constantly growing corporate profits. That’s not necessarily a good thing for the 99 percent.

The US economy is dominated by a Ponzi Scheme known as Wall Street. As corporate earnings rise, stock prices generally rise. If aggregate corporate profits go down, as they always must in time, then that 15,000+ value we see today with the Dow Jones Industrials can drop to 8,000 or less, as it did during the Great Recession.

Now imagine what would happen if the economy never came out of the Great Recession, like during the Great Depression. In October 1929, the Dow Jones was close to 400, up from less than 100 in 1921. The Depression hit that month, the economy entered into a sustained decline, the Dow dropped and dropped until it was less than 50 in October 1932. That’s a lot of speculative profits that were wiped out. The Dow began climbing with the election of FDR on November 8, 1932. But what if FDR didn’t win and the US continued down the same path? There’s a good chance the Dow would’ve dropped to a value of zero.

One way to avert such a calamity is to have constantly increasing population. As population grows, there are more people to feed, which means constantly growing demand for goods and services, which helps corporate profits rise, which keeps the Dow growing. The government will even feed and house tens of millions of people in order to keep demand up.

If, however, the US population was to decline, especially in the long-run, so too would the demand for goods and services. That means corporate profits would begin a long term drop. The financial markets would plummet in the long run. Paper profits that have grown over decades would vanish like smoke.

The birth rates of US citizens began to slow a few decades ago, and to compensate, your government opened the floodgates of immigration to compensate for that. Of course, there were other factors for doing this, as well. More immigrants meant a downward push on wage growth. The difference between what wages would’ve been in the absence of higher immigration and what they became with greater immigration went into the already fat wallets of the super rich via higher corporate profits, share prices and rising dividends.

This is not to suggest that immigration is always a bad thing, especially if there is a rising tide of prosperity for all. However, immigration during a time when there has been a massive redistribution of income and wealth flowing from the 99 to the 1 percent probably isn’t a good thing for the 99 percent. But it is good for Wall Street and the 1 percent, and for the reasons cited above.

If population growth continues to slow, and last year it grew only 0.7 percent, and middle class income continues to stagnate, then the current record rise in the Dow Jones Industrials suggests it is a bubble caused by redistributing income from the 99 to the 1 percent.

In other words, it is possible the current pathetic economic expansion is ambling down a road that ends at a very steep cliff. This brings us to a question.

Was the Great Recession just a blip on the road to an even greater Depression somewhere down the road a few years from now?

Read Full Post »

The Historical Lies of the Rich

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

The military-industry complex is not the biggest government welfare program of all time. It might be second, and like the biggest welfare program, the military-industrial complex is welfare for the rich, the 1 percent. Such corporations as General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin rely heavily on government spending to keep their profits soaring, their dividends rising and their share prices climbing. The 1 percent owns most of their shares.

That’s why the United States has a bloated military that is greater in size than the next nine largest military’s in the world combined, although some analysts suggest the US spends more on its military than the rest of the world combined. That’s likely.

At the peak of the US conquest of Iraq, the US had somewhere in the vicinity of 150,000 mercenaries earning over a $100,000 each. The government called these mercenaries “contractors,” as if they had been contracted to erect buildings. No, these were just mercenaries that had signed contracts to be US mercenaries. If you count these folks, it is likely the US spends more on its military than all other nations in the world.

Income redistribution from the 99 to the 1 percent. That’s what military spending is all about. Tax money, the blood of working Americans, government lies, they’re all redistributed to the rich.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Everybody with half a brain knows we in the US are better off than four years ago. The US was on the verge of an economic collapse four years ago, thanks to Republican policies. The policies of President Obama and the Federal Reserve saved the day. Under the Republican plan, which Wall Street Mitt the Twit Romney and his running mate Paul “Complete Idiot” Ryan plan to resurrect, the US economy was on the verge of a complete collapse, like during the Great Depression.

On the other hand, the US remains on the verge of collapse and Obama and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have no intention of doing anything about it. And it’s worse than I make it out to be. With over 93 percent of all US income growth going to the 1 percent, it’s only a matter of time before the economy continues to collapse.

Only the federal deficit, the Great Society programs like food stamps, and the New Deal (Social Security, unemployment insurance, etc…) have kept demand at a high enough level to stop the coming Great Collapse.

Click the link below for why the Democrats should celebrate Obama’s successes, but not his failure.

Is the USA Better Off Now Than Four Years Ago? The Guardian UK

Read Full Post »

The Federal Reserve plans to do everything in its power to spur economic growth except for the things that need to be done, all of which are outside of the Fed’s power. So the latest meeting of the Fed governors was a joke.

Income has been redistributed from the 99 to the 1 percent at record levels for the last several decades. For example, 1 percent now steal nearly 30 percent of total US income compared to about 7 percent thirty-two years ago. The 1 percent also received 93 percent of total US income growth for the last two years. That means the 99 percent have less and less money to burn, severely reducing the demand for goods and services, forcing US businesses to hoard almost $6 trillion because of the lack of demand. By the way, that’s money they’ve stolen via legislation from the 99 percent. Do you see a series of connections here?

One other point needs to be made; trickle down economics never worked. It was a scam. It was only intended to redistribute income from the 99 to the 1 percent. The folks at the Fed, and in the Federal government, have no intention of doing anything about these issues. That means whatever actions the Fed can take to spur economic growth are doomed to failure, even if the actions might result in some minor short term gains.

Click on the link below to see the actions the Fed intends to take.
Federal Reserve Prepared to Take Action on Economy–The Guardian UK

Read Full Post »

In 2009 the Guardian newspaper of the UK identified 25 people – bankers, economists, central bankers and politicians – whose actions had led the world into the worst economic turmoil since the Great Depression. On the fifth anniversary of the credit crunch, the Guardian asks, “What are they doing? As for the politicians on the list, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Phil Gramm and a few others, you’re looking at the politics of corruption. Too much money in politics bought presidents, senators and congressmen, like Wall Street Fetchboy Ron Wyden. And that immoral incompetent Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan is on the list. Other than that, it’s a wall street gang, more or less. Click the link below to read the Guardian’s findings.

Financial Crisis: 25 People at the Heart of the Crisis–The Guardian UK

Read Full Post »

The United States Federal Reserve’s recently announced that it’ll continue “Operation Twist” by buying an additional $267 billion of long-term Treasury bonds during the following six months. That means they’ll have bought a total of $667 billion for 2012. So far, this policy has had virtually no impact on interest rates or equity prices. Those markets failed to respond. That means that monetary easing is no longer a useful tool for increasing economic activity.

The fed’s policies during the economic crisis that began almost five years ago have been extremely helpful in bailing out rich, but remarkably dumb investors, but the policies have been lacking in bailing out the 99 percent. That’s the purpose of the Federal Reserve.

Of course, the federal government has followed the same path; bail out the 1 percent, to hell with the 99 percent.

Don’t expect the Federal Reserve or the Federal Government to deal with the massive redistribution of income and wealth (that has been legislatively created by the Federal Government) from the 99 to the 1 percent during the last thirty-one years. That’s the real problem with the economy. The demand for goods and services is lower than 30 years ago because the 1 percent now receive 27 percent of the total national income compared to about 8 percent thirty years ago. That means the 99 percent has less cash to buy stuff. And that means the demand for goods and services will continue to be weak.

Related Stories

The Federal Reserve Has Run Out of Options–The Guardian

Breakdown of the $26 Trillion the Federal Reserve Handed Out to Save Incompetent, But Rich Investors,

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,009 other followers