Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘economic growth’

“The health of the US economy is set to dominate the second day of the Democratic convention in Charlotte, North Carolina Wednesday, offering a rejoinder to Republican attacks over President Barack Obama’s economic management.”

The Dems aren’t likely to boast much about the state of the economy, since it is still sliding toward a complete economic collapse, albeit more slowly than when Obama took office, thanks to Republican economic policies. The collapse will likely occur just a few more years down the road.

That’s because the 1 percent is reaping almost all of the benefits of economic growth by using their cronies in the Democratic and Republican parties to pass federal and state legislation that redistributes income from working folks to the rich. That’s the game plan of both parties. The rich are their masters.

Nonetheless it’s interesting to look a “side-by-side comparison of Obama and Mitt Romney’s plans to reduce 8.3 percent unemployment, speed up lackluster 1.7 percent growth and tackle the $16 trillion national debt.” None of the plans deals with real issues, which is why both schemes continue to redistribute income from the bottom to the top. Wall Street Obama’s so-called plan seems to be to steal income from the 99 percent and give it to the 1 percent more slowly than Wall Street Mitt the Twit’s scam. Click the link below for the comparison.

Comparing the Economic Scams of Obama and Mitt the Twit — Rawstory.com

Read Full Post »

The Federal Reserve plans to do everything in its power to spur economic growth except for the things that need to be done, all of which are outside of the Fed’s power. So the latest meeting of the Fed governors was a joke.

Income has been redistributed from the 99 to the 1 percent at record levels for the last several decades. For example, 1 percent now steal nearly 30 percent of total US income compared to about 7 percent thirty-two years ago. The 1 percent also received 93 percent of total US income growth for the last two years. That means the 99 percent have less and less money to burn, severely reducing the demand for goods and services, forcing US businesses to hoard almost $6 trillion because of the lack of demand. By the way, that’s money they’ve stolen via legislation from the 99 percent. Do you see a series of connections here?

One other point needs to be made; trickle down economics never worked. It was a scam. It was only intended to redistribute income from the 99 to the 1 percent. The folks at the Fed, and in the Federal government, have no intention of doing anything about these issues. That means whatever actions the Fed can take to spur economic growth are doomed to failure, even if the actions might result in some minor short term gains.

Click on the link below to see the actions the Fed intends to take.
Federal Reserve Prepared to Take Action on Economy–The Guardian UK

Read Full Post »

Bernanke said he believed the jobs problem (lack of job creation) in the USA is a “cyclical” rather than a “structural” problem. What is he really saying? It’s simple.

The redistribution of income and wealth from the 99 percent to the one percent is not part of the problem. Of course, he’s lying. It doesn’t take a whiz to figure out that if 99 percent of the population earns 93 percent of the total income generated in the USA, and so much of it is redistributed to the one percent over the last thirty years so that the 99 percent earned only 75 percent of the total income, then the demand for goods and services would be less. Demand is what creates jobs.

click here for the complete story

Read Full Post »

President Evo Morales of Bolivia had an idea when he took office a few ago; he stopped using the government to redistribute income from the poor and what little middle class there is in Bolivia to the rich. Now demand for goods is up and poverty is down. And he did it without letting in corporate economic rapists.

What did Morales do? He ignored all the advice given him by Washington D.C. economists. Free trade? He tossed that income redistribution scam into the garbage. Bolivia “nationalized hydrocarbons, electricity, telecommunications and mining; renegotiated the presence of direct foreign investment in the country; implemented an expansive fiscal policy and closed borders to the free importation of economically strategic products. The state took 34% of the economy under its control.” That means the profits from those industries weren’t sent back to the United States or the United Kingdom or wherever the corporations that owned those industries are. The profits stayed in Bolivia.

The economy grew 5.4 percent last year. Since and including 2007, as the rest of the world crumbled, the Bolivian grew an average of 4.5 percent per year. Are you listening Obama?

click here for the complete story

Read Full Post »

The one thing not mentioned in the article below from the New York Times is that things are still deteriorating, economically speaking. The rich are still getting richer because the government at all levels, but at the federal level in particular, continues to redistribute income from working citizens to the affluent. Congressman Earl Blumenauer voted to redistribute income in this direction when he voted for the South Korea and Panama Free Trade Treaties a few weeks ago. Likewise, Senator Ron Wyden is another Wall Street legislative prostitute who bends over and serves the one percent. When Wall Street bends Wyden over and reams him full of cash, Wyden then reams us. He voted for the same treaties, plus the Colombia Free Trade Treaty. The story below tells us the economy is growing, but most people aren’t experiencing it. That’s because the rich are getting richer. Thank you Blumenauer and Wyden, my legislative prostitutes of the month, year and decade — John Hively

By SHAILA DEWAN
Published: October 27, 2011

Economic growth in the United States picked up in the third quarter, the Commerce Department said Thursday, in an encouraging sign that the recovery, while still painfully slow, has not stalled.

Total output grew at an estimated annual rate of 2.5 percent from July to September, still modest but almost double the 1.3 percent rate in the second quarter, the department reported.

The pace, however, was not brisk enough to recover the ground lost in the economic bust, lower unemployment or even substantially dispel fears of a second recession. Still, the report offered a small helping of reassurance.

“It ain’t brilliant, but at least it’s heading in the right direction,” said Ian Shepherdson, the chief United States economist for High Frequency Economics, a data analysis firm. “I want to see 4 percent, but given that people were talking about a new recession, I’ll take 2.5 or 3, thanks very much.”

The consensus forecast of economists shows continued growth at about a 2 percent rate for the rest of this year and all of 2012. That would be an improvement over the first half of this year, but a strong recovery would require a rate closer to 4 percent. In the 25 years prior to the recession, the United States economy grew at about 3.25 percent a year, though demographic changes have led to lower expectations for future growth even in a healthy economy.

This economy is still a flurry of mixed signals. Real income has declined, but so has the number of people filing for unemployment, a trend that continued in the number of new claims announced Thursday morning.

The stock market has rallied but consumer confidence has plummeted to levels last seen in 2008. That sentiment helped push pending sales of existing U.S. homes down for a third successive month during September, the National Association of Realtors reported on Thursday.

The economy may be growing, but Americans cannot feel it.

“For most people, they’re unable to really make a distinction between a recession and just 2 percent growth, which means the economy is growing so weakly it can’t hire enough people to make a dent in unemployment,” said Bernard Baumohl, the chief economist for the Economic Outlook Group.

Thursday’s numbers showed a larger than expected increase in consumer spending, fueled by purchases of durable recreational goods like televisions. Personal spending increased by 2.4 percent, accounting for the lion’s share of the growth.

But business investment, which has been strong throughout the recovery, continued to grow as well, with a 13.3 percent increase in non-residential building and a 17.4 percent increase in equipment and software purchases.

Growth in residential construction slowed, but spending on furniture and appliances picked up. Government spending stayed flat, with a reduction in state, local and federal non-military spending canceled out by an increase in defense spending.

The growth rate was weighed down by a meager increase in inventories, which Mr. Shepherdson said he expected would turn out to have been higher than believed. The initial G.D.P. report is based on estimates and is subject to multiple revisions.The growth that economists expected in the first part of the year was dampened by shocks like blizzards, a spike in gasoline prices and the earthquake in Japan, which disrupted the global supply chain. Those effects were fading away by the third quarter, economists said.

But other risks still loom, from Europe’s debt crisis to the possibility that President Obama’s proposal for renewed stimulus measures, including a payroll tax cut, could fail to get through Congress.

“The better growth performance in the third quarter doesn’t mean that the economy can’t ‘double-dip’ back into recession,” wrote Nigel Gault, an economist with IHS Global Insight, ahead of the report. “But it suggests that it has more momentum than there seemed to be just a month or two ago, and underscores that the primary recession risks are from external shocks, with Europe the biggest wild card.”

On the domestic front, analysts seemed to be betting that the payroll tax cut would continue, but were divided on the odds that extended unemployment benefits would be renewed. The two programs together represent spending power equal to about 1 percent of G.D.P., though some of that money may go into savings or be spent on imported goods.

More pessimistic economists fear that the third-quarter growth will be unsustainable because housing values remain low and consumers, whose spending accounts for more than 70 percent of G.D.P., have little reason to expect that their financial situation will improve. The increase in consumer spending was accompanied by a drop in the savings rate and an inching upward of credit card debt, possibly to accommodate purchases that could no longer be delayed.

“That is unlikely to continue if the economy grows weakly because Americans are much more conscious about adding on a lot of debt to their balance sheet,” said Kathy Bostjancic, director for macroeconomic analysis at the Conference Board, which tracks consumer and executive sentiment. The negative outlook was beginning to spread to businesses, Ms. Bostjancic said.

“C.E.O. confidence is starting to melt away, along with consumer confidence levels, which have always been low,” she said.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,017 other followers