Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘free trade treaties’


Free trade is a failed economic policy. Just look at your nation. After thirty years of free trade policies, unemployment is high because tens of millions of jobs have been shipped overseas. The 1 percent have stolen an increasing share of the total national income via free trade treaties, up from 8 percent in 1980 to a little over 30 percent today. That means the 99 percent have less money to burn, ensuring that demand for goods and services is weak, and that fewer jobs are being created than thirty-two years ago, when the Gross Domestic Product and the national population were about 60 percent the size of today. Shared prosperity has not been accomplished because the free trade policy was an income redistribution scam that has been backed by useful idiots of the 1 percent, such as Wall Street Senator Ron Wyden.

Despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Wyden wants us to believe that free trade has been good for the nation. No it hasn’t, but it has been good the 1 percent of the population that he represents.

The super rich are getting richer while the rest of us are being financially pushed down. Part of the problem is free trade. The super rich benefit the most from the biggest welfare program of them; free trade. Those treaties open up foreign nations for US corporations to ship jobs there, or to create them there, when otherwise they could not. The difference between the old, higher, US wages and the new, lower wages goes into the pockets of the super rich via higher corporate earnings, rising share prices and surging dividends.

Those treaties have allowed corporations to ship our tax base overseas, and redistributed those taxes into the pockets of the rich. That’s why our schools are jammed packed and in disrepair. That’s why our government services cost more, with fees to enter parks, rising car and title registration, etc….

In the UK, some folks have figured out the free trade scam. One can only assume that Wyden has been paid by Wall Street to lie to us. According to the UK, “…staring dumbfounded at the lessons unlearned in Britain, Europe and the US, it strikes me that the entire structure of neoliberal (free trade) thought is a fraud. The demands of the ultra-rich have been dressed up as sophisticated economic theory and applied regardless of the outcome. The complete failure of this world-scale experiment is no impediment to its repetition. This has nothing to do with economics. It has everything to do with power. Parenthesis are mine, and I bold the letters.

Wall Street has the power, via their ownership of politicians such as Wyden, John Boehner, Paul Ryan and Barack Obama. The president’s people are negotiating the Trans Pacific Partnership, the biggest free trade income redistribution scam of all time. Don’t let him destroy the middle class. Stop the madness of this failed economic policy.

Click the link below for the full story from the Guardian of the UK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/14/neoliberal-theory-economic-failure

Read Full Post »

From the Economic Policy Institute: “This graph puts a price tag on what rising inequality has cost middle-income families. It shows actual household income growth for the middle 20 percent of households, as well as what their income would have been had it grown at the overall average growth rate—a rate buoyed by extraordinarily rapid growth at the top. The upshot: Had incomes of these middle-income families simply grown at the average rate (i.e., had inequality not risen) from 1979 to 2007, their average household income in 2007 would have been nearly $19,000 higher—a 27 percent increase. Essentially, rising inequality imposed a tax of 27 percent on middle-fifth household incomes over this period.”

I disagree with the above assessment. The graph really shows that roughly 27 percent of middle class household income has been redistributed to the top 1 percent by the federal government via legislation, such as free trade income redistribution treaties. That’s why it’s a rigged game.

Read Full Post »

Free trade treaties are gifts given to Wall Street and billionaires by US government officials, such as President George W. Bush, President Bill Clinton, President Barack Obama and “Senator Wall Street fetch boy Ron Wyden.” The treaties allow US businesses to ship the jobs of US citizens overseas, and also allows them to create jobs overseas, which wouldn’t be possible without the treaties. When this occurs, the difference between the old and higher wages in the US and the new lower wages goes into the pockets of the billionaires that fund political campaigns and propaganda advertisements directed at the 99 percent. In other words, free trade treaties are an income redistribution scam from the 99 to the 1 percent. The 99 percent are the people that need jobs to support themselves.

When their jobs are shipped overseas so that their income can be redistributed to billionaires, they not only lose their livelihoods, which they would perform year are year, but the billionaires get the income of the 99 percent year after year. The result is the destruction of local and state tax bases that support state and local government services, such as fire, road repair, police and schools.

We hear from the corporate news media that “the United States has a trade deficit with China. China had a record trade surplus with the US in October of this year.” Of course that’s a half-truth, although it’s more likely an out and out lie. US corporations have shipped production to China during the last several years. The products shipped from China to the USA come with names such as Microsoft, Apple, Nike and many others. The US trade deficit is with US corporations, which are owned by billionaire investors. Therefore, the trade deficit is not between China and the US, but between the billionaire investors and the rest of the USA. In other words, the US trade deficit gives us a rough idea how massive the yearly redistribution of income and wealth is occuring every month between the billionaires and the 99 percent.

The 1 percent now steal about 29-31 percent of all US income, up from 23.5 percent in 2008, and about 8 percent thirty-two years ago. According to the US Census Bureau, the US had a trade deficit with all nations of less than $20 billion in 1980. In 2011, that deficit was nearly $560 billion. The growth of the US trade deficit and income redistribution has mirrowed each other. Think about it.

Related Article Below

Trade Deficit Dots Connect to Billionaires–truthout.org

Read Full Post »

The rich want to become richer since failure to do so will result in the collapse of Wall Street. It’s as simple as that. That’s why government crams “free trade income redistribution, tax base exporting, treaties.” These treaties redistribute income from the bottom to the top. But why does the corporate media cover up these scams? Click the link below.

Why Big Media Protects the One Percent

Read Full Post »

What will you achieve if you take out student loans, go to college, improve your skills and get ahead of your competition? For the first time in US history, you’ll most likely get a ton of student loan debt and join your competition in a place on a very long unemployment line. But the affluent will become richer, thanks to your debt. By the way, that’s something neither Republicans nor Democrats want you to know. Student loan debt is a scam to make you indentured servants for a very long time.

This is the new normal. Go to college, get heavily into debt, and become unemployed or underemployed. Blame free trade treaties. Those treaties are intended to redistribute income from the 99 to the 1 percent. Ship the jobs overseas, or negotiate a treaty that makes it easier to create jobs in lower wage countries. Pretty soon the jobs here dry up, and so does the tax base, resulting in government layoffs, such as police and teachers. Jobs gone. Just like that. But the difference between the old wages here and the new wages over there fly into the already fat wallets of the super rich, who then buy more politicians, such as Senator Ron Wyden, who then vote yes on more income redistribution treaties. That’s the whole game.

By the way, for every 68 or so blue collar jobs shipped away, or created overseas, another 32 jobs go overseas with them, and these are mostly white collar jobs that require a college degree. These include management, accountants, lawyers, bookkeepers, computer programmers, etc… Every one of these jobs shipped overseas has meant the loss of three other jobs in various local industries, many of which require college degrees.

This is why there are so many college educated people in the unemployment line.

Most unemployed Americans Attended at Least Some College

Read Full Post »

The decline of the United States began thirty years ago with President Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts for the rich. That extra money from the cuts allowed the rich to purchase legislation that redistributed income from the middle class to themselves, such as free trade agreements which allowed corporations to ship the jobs of working people overseas. The difference between the old wages here and the newer lower wages over there were shoveled into the pockets of the rich via rising corporate profits, enhanced dividends and soaring share prices.

The rich were also able to purchase deregulation of various industries, which allowed corporations to jack up prices that the middle class pays, but which pushed up corporate profits, dividends and share prices. The rich also ensured the Sherman Anti-Trust Act was thrown into the garbage and that the way the government measured inflation was changed so as not to measure inflation. That’s because price increases from overly cooperative corporate so-called rivals meant more money from the middle class was and is redistributed to the rich.

The rich were also able to purchase more free trade treaties, additional policies to redistribute income, such as lax Wall Street regulations. The rich also purchased the majority of politicians of the Democratic Party, including President Barack Obama. That’s how the one percent was able to rob the 99 percent of 93 percent of total US income growth from 2009 to 2011.

The tax cuts for the rich from Reagan to George W. Bush have pushed the United States into decline. That’s why we need a progressive tax with a 91 percent top marginal rate. That would curtail the power of the one percent to purchase destructive economic policies that have pushed the US to the economic abyss, and perhaps even reverse this trend.

Additional related stories

why the USA is in decline

Read Full Post »

The Oregonian writer Steve Duin wrote a nice piece about teacher cutbacks at Franklin High School coming in the next few months. He only told the effects, and I asked him to write about what has caused these cutbacks. Below is a link to his well written column, and below that is my response.

At Portland's Franklin High School, the Bell Tolls for…Them

Dear Steve Duin,
I appreciate your nice, but short-sighted, story titled, “At Franklin, the bell tolls for…them.” You quote teacher Portia Hall as saying, “’I’ve been teaching for fifteen years, and I’ve never had a year when we didn’t cut. Even when times were good.’”

Why don’t you tell the whole story about school funding and teacher cut backs? Why don’t you write about how free trade treaties have shipped jobs and much of the tax base overseas? Why don’t you write about how those treaties make it more profitable for American businesses to create jobs in other nations rather than here? Why don’t you write about how the difference between the old higher wages in the US and the new lower wages over there go into the pockets of Wall Street fat cats and other rich people via higher corporate profits, enhanced dividends and rising share prices? The people that lose those jobs wind up searching for work. That’s not a very good trade. This leads to a good question.

What are the federal government and the American economy for? Is it to redistribute more income to the already rich at the expense of working people? That’s been happening for the last thirty years.

These agreements are the primary reason why the rich are getting richer. They’re why the one percent received 93 percent of total US income growth from 2009 to 2010.

Why is the tax base crumbling? Why are teachers being laid off three years after the official end of the recession? Why can’t the economy create over 12 million jobs with rising real wages nowadays, like it did when Jimmy Carter was president and the economy and the population were only about 60 percent the size of what they are now? Why have only 4 million jobs with declining real wages and salaries been created in the twelve years since George W. Bush took office? Why is the economy so weak?

Free trade “income redistribution” agreements are the greatest reasons the one percent receive nearly 25 percent of the total US income nowadays compared with about 8 percent under Carter. The result has been devastating to the 99 percent in lost jobs, declining real income, demand too weak to create jobs in the US at previous levels, evaporating tax bases, teachers voting to strike in Gresham-Barlow and the Parkrose districts. These agreements are also the primary reasons why Portia Hall has never seen “a year we didn’t cut.”

Just open your eyes and look at those free trade treaties and ask yourself what the upcoming Trans Pacific Free Trade Agreement is going to do to 99 percent of Americans. If it’s implemented, the agreement is going to redistribute even more income to the one percent from the 99 percent, leading to more jobs shipped overseas, jobs created in other nations rather than here, shrinking tax bases, cutbacks in education, police, firefighters and all kinds of government positions and programs that the 99 percent rely upon. Are these the results we want from our federal government and our economy? I don’t think so, but that’s what we’ve got.

So I ask you again, Why don’t you write about the causes, as well as the effects? Why don’t you tell the whole story?

Warmest Regards,

John Hively

Read Full Post »

There’s an interesting story below from Reuters about the lack of job creation in the United States during the month of August. As everybody knows, including Oregon Congressman Earl Blumenauer and Senator Ron Wyden, the lack of jobs is caused by the lack of demand for goods and services. This dismal demand for goods and services have been caused in large part by free trade treaties, which have redistributed income from working Americans to the ultra affluent. Almost everybody knows this, including the senator and congressman mentioned above. However, like everybody else, those two drones of corporate America prefer to turn a blind eye to reality in order to continue to service their corporate masters.

When a job paying $50,000 a year is shipped overseas, or when a job is established overseas that otherwise would have been created in the USA in the absence of a trade treaty, the job pays considerably less over there than here, say $45,000 less. The $45,000 difference between the old pay and the new is redistributed from the American working class citizen who lost the job to rich shareholders via dividends and higher stock prices. Both Blumenauer and Wyden know this.

Yet they still persist in supporting free trade treaties that are coming up with South Korea, Colombia and Panama. That’s because they’re paid by the rich via campaign contributions and other perks to support this redistribution, despite the fact that these policies are killing the US economy and driving more and more people into unemployment and poverty.

Tomorrow, I will show how these treaties will redistribute income from the people of Colombia, Panama and South Korea to the US rich. Below is the article from Reuters about job growth halting in August. Remember, Congressman Blumenauer and Senator Wyden have happily created this problem with their support for free trade treaties. They are part of the problem, not the solution. And also remember, the US could be slipping into a recession without having recovered from the last recession. So the next time you see your congressman and or senator from Oregon, be sure to say “thanks” with sarcasam dripping from your lips.

(Reuters) – Employment growth ground to a halt in August, reviving recession fears and piling pressure on both President Barack Obama and the Federal Reserve to provide more stimulus to aid the frail economy.

For the first time in nearly a year the economy failed to create new jobs on a net basis according to the Labor Department’s monthly nonfarm payrolls survey on Friday.

Economists had expected nonfarm employment to rise 75,000 last month but they cautioned against viewing the data as a surefire sign of recession.

A worsening debt crisis in Europe and an acrimonious political fight over the government budget and debt, which led Standard & Poor’s to strip the country of its AAA credit rating, ignited a massive stock market sell-off last month and sent business and consumer confidence tumbling.

“The economy is struggling against stiff headwinds, which appear to have intensified in recent months,” said Millan Mulraine, senior macro strategist at TD Securities in New York. “While it has clearly not fallen off the cliff, there is little to suggest it is anywhere close to regaining its momentum.”

Investors fled riskier assets on the news, sending stocks tumbling, pushing up the price of gold, and lowering U.S. Treasury bond yields.

Employment was dampened by 45,000 striking workers at Verizon Communications. Those workers have since returned to work and will be counted as on the payroll in September.

But even taking that into account the report was largely bleak. The unemployment rate, however, held at 9.1 percent as a survey of households found both job growth and, for the first time in a year, an expanding labor force.

With the jobless rate stuck above 9.0 percent and confidence collapsing, President Barack Obama faces pressure to come up with ways to spur job creation. The health of the labor market could determine whether he wins re-election next year.

Obama will lay out a new jobs plan in a speech to the nation on Thursday, and White House advisers said the data underscored a need for action.

“He will be very specific about what we can do that can have a meaningful impact on job growth in the economy right away,” Gene Sperling, a top economic adviser to Obama, told Reuters Insider.

Obama on Friday withdrew new rules to limit smog pollution that businesses had argued would kill jobs and cost them billions of dollars.

The Republican speaker of the House of Representatives, John Boehner, said in a statement it was time for political cooperation “to end the uncertainty facing families and small businesses, and create a better environment for long-term economic growth.”

But speaking later to reporters in Ohio, Boehner struck a combative tone toward the White House and Senate Democrats. “They want to push for the same kind of agenda — more stimulus spending and short-term gimmicks, higher taxes, more regulations. We’ve seen more of this before and it has failed.”

EYES ON THE FED

Despite massive cash injections by both the government and the Fed, sustainable job growth has eluded the economy.

“The entire recovery has been a recovery in name only. The Achilles heel … has always been the lack of job creation,” said John Ryding, chief economist at RDQ Economics in New York.

The data could strengthen the hand of officials at the Fed who wanted to do more to help the sputtering economy in August. The economy needs to generate about 150,000 jobs each month just to keep the unemployment rate steady over time.

The central bank, which meets on September 20-21, cut overnight interest rates to near zero in December 2008 and has bought $2.3 trillion in securities to inject cash into the economy.

Despite simmering inflation pressures, many economists expect the Fed to launch a third round of bond buying soon to put downward pressure on long-term rates, partly because the federal government appears intent on belt-tightening.

“Even the inflation hawks have to be concerned by this report,” said Joel Naroff, chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors in Holland, Pennsylvania. “With fiscal policy at all levels of government restraining growth, the Fed is the only game in town.”

Expectations of further Fed action drove the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note below 2.0 percent. The U.S. dollar rose on safe-haven flows, while the S&P 500 stock index fell 2.53 percent.

UNDERLYING PACE OF JOB GROWTH WEAK

While employment was held back by the Verizon strike, the impact was offset somewhat by the return of 23,000 public employees in Minnesota after a partial government shutdown.

Stripping out both of those factors, employment would have expanded by more than 20,000 jobs last month and, without the strike, private payrolls would have increased by 62,000, instead of a paltry 17,000.

Still, the overall tenor of the report was decidedly weak.

Employers created a combined 58,000 fewer jobs in June and July than previously thought, and the length of the average workweek fell 0.1 hour to 34.2 hours, the fewest since January. In addition, average hourly earnings dropped three cents.

About 43 percent of the 14 million Americans unemployed in August had been out of work for at least six months. The jobless rate would have been 16.2 percent if people who want to work but have given up looking for jobs and those working only part time for economic reasons were counted.

Although hiring cooled, fairly steady readings on claims for jobless benefits, relatively strong consumer spending and continued demand for manufactured goods offer hope the economy will avoid recession.

Analysts say the economy should pick up steam from here, although they warn the recovery is so weak that any fresh shock could send it tumbling. In the first half of the year, the economy expanded at less than a 1.0 percent annual rate.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,016 other followers