Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Karl Marx’

“Apparently unbeknownst to many, the working class in America has been living with austerity economics for forty years now. Since the 1970s the proportion of what American labor is paid relative to what it produces has been declining, as have the effective tax rates on corporations and the wealthy. With corporations and the rich who own them receiving a larger proportion of what labor produces and paying less in taxes, there is now little left to pay for necessary social programs such as schools, health care and pensions. But this shortfall is no accident. It is the intended result of four decades of policies specifically designed to enrich the ruling class at the expense of labor, the middle class and the poor.”

The paragraph above is heisted from the story that is linked below. It’s highly accurate point-of-view as to what is happening to the US economy and how the 99 percent are getting screwed over by the 1 percent via their control of the federal government and their lapdogs in politics like Wall Street Fetchboy Senator Ron “Total Sleezebag” Wyden.

The Economic Crisis: Say Goodbye to Social Security? Counterpunch.com

Read Full Post »

“Aftershock” is a copycat ripoff of several other books. There are significant differences. Aftershock lacks the depth of analysis of similar books.

On the other hand, like many others starting a decade or more ago, Reich correctly identifies the mal-distribution of income in the USA that has occurred over the last thirty years as the primary problem with the economy. Okay, give Reich credit. Like a lot of other people, he figured that one out.

After that Reich moves off into a fantasy world when he blames automation as the primary culprit for the loss of jobs in the United States and one of the chief culprits for the redistribution of income from working people to the rich over the last thirty years. What nonsense! Perhaps this was a way for Reich to exonerate the Clinton Administration and its support of free trade agreements like Nafta. Reich was labor secretary under Clinton. The problem is that free trade agreements are a primary agent of income redistribution.

A corporation ships high paying job overseas and then redistributes the difference between the old compensation in the USA and the new lower compensation in third world nations to rich CEOs and shareholders via higher dividends and share prices. Anybody with half a brain can see this, but Reich can’t.

Reich’s book came out just in time to give corporate Democrats the rationale they need to support free trade agreements last summer with South Korea, Columbia and Panama. The Economic Policy Institute estimates nearly a million American jobs will be lost over the next ten years to the South Korea free trade agreement alone. Millions more might be lost to Panama and Columbia. Congress approved those treaties last October and President Obama decided losing jobs wasn’t a big deal since his re-election wasn’t for another year.

Liberal Democratic Senator Ron Wyden prepared a summer offensive in 2011 in the latest round of his war against the middle class. This corporate plutocrat is a member of the Senate Finance Committee. Wyden is also the chairperson of the subcommittee on trade. Those three trade agreements came come through Wyden. He supported them.

Jaymie White is Wyden’s point man on trade for the subcommittee. At a meeting last year with activists opposed to these free trade income redistribution agreements, White insisted that free trade did not cost our nation any jobs. He insisted automation is the culprit.

Thank you Robert Reich for giving talking points to the corporate Democrats even though knowledgeable people know this is a lie. Free trade is an income redistribution scam and Reich knows this. By the way, the idea of automation as a permanent job destroyer goes back to David Ricardo and Karl Marx.

Look what automation has done for manufacturing in China. It has created millions of jobs. It’s true that automation kills jobs, but the forces that bring about automation also bring more jobs. Think in terms of a store clerk twenty years ago. Nowadays, some of them have been replaced by machines. So those people have lost their jobs. But the machines have to be designed, built, installed and maintained. That creates more jobs.

Same thing with typewriters. They’re still around but not widely used compared to fifty years ago. They’ve been replaced by computers. The computer industry supports a lot more jobs per capita than the old typewriter industry used to. Ergo, Reich is completely wrong on this.

That’s why despite automation, and productivity increases, the number of jobs actually increase. That’s why Reich and this book are full of it.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,013 other followers