Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The corporate news pounced on the latest report issued by the Board of Trustees of the Social Security Trust Fund. CNBC News interviewed Michael Tanner of the Koch Brothers funded Cato Institute. Tanner was dumb enough or dishonest enough to say, “Every bond redeemed from the Social Security Trust Fund has to come out of the general revenue, so we’re actually increasing the federal deficit in order to pay off social security.” What a lie, and in many ways.

20046712_10211899706460813_3970402639122158449_n.jpg

The Social Security Trust Fund has a $2.6 trillion surplus. The Trust Fund purchased US Treasury bonds and collects about $160 billion in interest a year. Bonds are loans. The US government borrowed the $2.6 trillion from the Trust Fund, and it will soon be time to pay that money back to the Trust Fund. That will not add to the deficit at all since the Trust Fund did not need to invest in the bonds, but it was a prudent thing to do to collect the interest. But lets get to Tanner’s lie; the US government issues and sells new bonds to pay for any bonds coming due. Only interest is paid from the general funds unless there is a budget surplus that allows for paying down the total deficit. The folks at CNBC News made certain not to question Tanner’s lie. That’s because they want to keep us ignorant.

Second, the Chinese government has trillions of dollars invested in US treasury bonds, as does Wall Street. When the US treasury bonds held by the Chinese or Goldman Sachs, or US hedge funds come due, nobody says that by paying its debt, the US government is adding to the deficit. Why is a different standard applied to Wall Street and Chinese investors on the one hand, and the Social Security Trust Fund on the other hand? The answer, of course, is CNBC wants to keep us ignorant. The Social Security Trust Fund has not contributed a penny to the US deficit, but they don’t want us to know that.

The Trustee report mentioned the coming of a deficit for the Trust Fund in 2034, which will result in payment reductions for retirees of approximately 16 percent, unless something is done to plug the gap. Ethan Wolff-Mann, reporting for Yahoo News, claimed “A root cause for the financial woes for Medicare and Social Security is the aging baby boomer population.”

That’s another lie meant to distract you from reality. Tens of millions of US jobs that paid into the social security trust fund have been exported to low wage nations such as China. The difference between the old US wages and the new Chinese, Vietnamese, Pakistani, and Mexican wages have all gone into the pockets of the rich via higher corporate earnings, rising dividends, and surging share prices. Capital gains from the sale of assets (such as corporate stocks and bonds), and dividends are exempt from social security taxation. The rich, in other words, are not paying social security taxes on the trillions of dollars they have stolen from the rest of us. That’s why there is an impending deficit in the Trust Fund.

So the easiest way, and morally Jesus Christ way, to offset these government policies that have stolen from the Trust Fund is to have a graduated Social Security tax on dividends, as well as on capital gains derived from the sale of stocks and bonds. Of course, a Social Security tax on stock and bond transactions could also achieve the desired effect.

In either case, or in both cases should they be legislatively enacted, the Social Security Trust Fund would be solvent into infinity and most likely a significant raise can be provided to beneficiaries, which would then strengthen the US economy by increasing the demand for goods and services.

Steve Ruis has pointed out, “Note that the SS Trust Fund didn’t choose to buy US Treasuries, it is required to invest all excess funds in US Treasuries by an act of Congress! Some critics have referred to those treasuries as “worthless paper” when trying to undermine the SS system. Amazing!”


On behalf of the Wall Street Democratic Party, hundreds of thousands of people have called for the impeachment of President Donald Trump, and some of them called for impeachment even before he was sworn into office. Here’s what I think of them; Sore losers and misguided Wall Street pawns being used by the Wall Street Democratic Gold Plated Leadership.

The Democratic Party abandoned working people decades ago.

Several thousand of us fought on the front lines in the battles against the massive income redistribution scam promoted by a Democratic president and called the Trans-Pacific Partnership. This scam would have exported millions of jobs and redistributed trillions of dollars of income from the 99 to the 1 percent while most of those now calling for Trump’s impeachment stood on the sidelines and shouted hooray for their team on social issues.

For the past 40 years, the Democratic Party as a national organization has systematically abandoned its historic representation of the working class in favor of a wholesale embrace of Wall Street’s and other corporate principles that squash workers’ representation at all levels of political and workplace engagement, and enhance the power of the wealthy few to govern all aspects of our lives.

It was a Democratic president supported by the Republican Party who unleashed Wall Street by signing legislation repealing Glass-Steagal, legislation which had forced a separation of commercial and investment banking and had protected the US economy for sixty years.

It was a Democratic president supported by the Republican Party who signed the Telecommunications Act which allowed the monopolization of the supposed news you receive. Nowadays, six major corporations control 90 percent of the supposed news we absorb, and much of it is Republican and Democratic Party propaganda.

It was a Democratic president who signed a free trade pact that allowed Mexico to officially swallow almost two million US jobs, and most likely much more. The difference between the old US wages and the new lower Mexican wages goes straight into the pockets of the already super-rich via higher corporate profits, surging dividends, and rising share prices. This is called income redistribution. Thank you, Bill and Hillary!

It was a Wall Street Democratic president (with Republican support) who acquiesced to demands to gut welfare programs that had for decades helped workers build their lives without an ax of abject poverty constantly hanging over their heads.

Wall Street Democrats watched (and frequently voted for) the gutting of pensions, the wars we were lied into which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of human beings, the ability of the executive branch to assassinate US citizens without trial, the militarization of police, the fall of worker wages and skyrocketing compensation for the wealthy, the deregulation of Wall Street, and the ongoing privatization of public education. In effect, Wall Street Democrats such as Ron Wyden, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama led the charge to create the still growing massive income and wealth inequality we experience today, as well as override the US Constitution in the process.

Eric Ethington, writing the Salt Lake City Tribune, perhaps said it best.

“The idea that Trump is somehow unique, or distinctly worse than other conservatives in his policies is laughable. If Trump were to be impeached today, the same agenda would continue rolling forward without a moment’s pause, because for all the posturing of House Speaker Paul Ryan, or Sen. Orrin Hatch or Rep. Mia Love, the ideas Trump is pushing is exactly what they have been advocating for years — albeit with much more disguised and sophisticated rhetoric. The only difference seems to be the more overtly authoritarian, racist and sexist rhetoric Trump uses and the boneheaded clumsiness of his incompetent staff.”

“What good is getting rid of one bombastic fool if there’s no legitimate voice of the workers to step in? Pretending everything was fine before Trump is lunacy.”

Stop allowing yourself to be mad at Trump. We all know the Republican Party is the party of the rich folks, and nothing has changed with Trump at its helm. The real enemy of the people is the Democratic leadership which fought tooth and nail to ensure Bernie Sanders, the people’s representative, did not get the Democratic Party presidential nomination in 2016, so that the Wall Street representative named Hillary Clinton would.


The entire Republican Party (Think John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Donald Trump) and nine-tenths of the Democratic Party (Think Hillary and Bill and Ron Wyden) managing the US federal government have been committed to redistributing trillions of dollars of income and wealth from the 99 to the 1 percent. The result has been wonderful for people who are already rich, and pretty much own the politicians of both major political parties as they do dogs on leashes. This has been devastating to those whose incomes and wealth have been redistributed to the rich and powerful leash holders.

According to AARP Bulletin, “Older Americans are selling their prescription painkillers to drug dealers to raise needed cash.”

Written by Joe Eaton, the story begins with “Over a span of about two years, Ajellon Dedeaux, a 29-year-old drug dealer, sold thousands of prescription painkillers on the illicit drug market near Sacramento, California. Finding customers was easy. The hard part was finding a supply of pills. A reliable source?

“Older people,” Dedeaux said in an email sent from a federal prison in Arizona. Dedeaux is serving twelve years for drug dealing.

According to Eaton, “Some (Retired Americans) sell their pills due to a financial crisis or to make ends meet.”

Retired Americans are forced to do this due to poverty and they also find it easy to gain prescriptions from doctors. Of course, if their insurance covers most of the cost of the pills, they can and are forced to illegally sell the painkillers to drug dealers.

“If they discover they can make $20 a pill on the street, then it becomes a temptation to supplement their income,” said Charlie Chichon, executive director of the Ntional Association of Drug Diversion Investigators.

According to convicted drug dealer Austin Serb, “A patient who is prescribed three pills a day can make up to $3600 a month,” which may be far more than many retired people receive from Social Security, 401Ks, IRAs, and pensions.

Of course, this is one of the side effects of ensuring that 36 percent of the yearly income produced in the United States goes to the 1 percent, up from 8 percent in 1980. Wall Street Senator Ron Wyden is most likely the biggest scam artist in Washington D.C. Wyden pretends to support seniors while voting to exports tens of millions of jobs overseas, including pensions.

When Social Security can easily be strengthened with expanded payments to seniors, simply by eliminating the cap currently at $127,200, Wall Street Senator Ron Wyden continues his cozy relationship with rich Wall Street folks, which is why he has always made certain to do nothing but keep exporting our tax paying jobs overseas. Wyden’s Wall Street masters do not want the cap eliminated. One of Wyden’s favorite ploys is to pretend he cares about seniors while gutting programs that help them, like exporting jobs overseas by the millions and thereby redistributing payments to social security by the millions to the uber rich whom he supports.

Click here for the story from Eaton.

The Senate’s bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act with the American Health Care Act (AHCA) is not a healthcare bill. It’s a tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, paid for by a dramatic reduction in healthcare funding for approximately 23 million poor, disabled, working and middle-class Americans.

America’s wealthiest taxpayers (earning more than $200,000 a year, $250,000 for couples) would get a tax cut totaling $346bn over 10 years, representing what they save from no longer financing healthcare for lower-income Americans.

That’s not all. The bill would save an additional $400bn on Medicaid, which Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, and Donald Trump are intent on shrinking in order to cut even more taxes for the wealthy and for big corporations.

If enacted, it would be the largest single transfer of wealth to the rich from the middle class and poor in American history.

This disgrace is being proposed at a time when the country’s rich receive the highest percentage of America’s income since the era of the robber barons of the late nineteenth century. They have received virtually all income growth since 1981 because of their massive financial and political power.

19248151_1894456643898638_8956452437251709404_n

According to the Economic Policy Institute, “As Medicaid is slashed, households’ premium costs (will) skyrocket, and protections for people with preexisting conditions are eliminated, 23 million Americans will lose their health insurance by 2026. The majority would lose it to breathtakingly large cuts to the vital Medicaid program (almost $900 billion over the next decade). Further, millions more would lose the coverage they get through their employer if AHCA passes.”

In other words, the AHCA is a massive income redistribution program from the 99 to the 1 percent.

The appliance maker Whirlpool has asked the U.S. government to impose trade barriers on washing machines imported from South Korean companies, escalating a trade dispute that has been ongoing for years.

Anybody with half a brain could see this coming before President Obama and his henchmen and henchwomen, like Wall Street Senator Ron Wyden, signed the South Korea Free Trade Treaty. Yet, Obama and his sleazy corporate Demorats, like Wyden, pushed for this scam anyway, mainly because it redistributes income from US workers to billionaire US investors, hedge funds and other finance types that finance the Demorat Party.

With headquarters in Benton Harbor Michigan, Whirlpool Corporation is the world’s largest home appliance maker. In the U.S., Whirlpool has eight manufacturing facilities: Amana, Iowa; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Cleveland, Tennessee; Clyde, Ohio; Findlay, Ohio; Greenville, Ohio; Marion, Ohio; and Ottawa, Ohio. Whirlpool has five factories in Mexico. Whirlpool has over 28,000 employees in the United States and Mexico. Those jobs are at risk.

USA Today reports that “In filing a petition to the U.S. International Trade Commission Wednesday, the Benton Harbor, Michigan-based manufacturer is seeking remedy from U.S. regulators on its claim that Samsung and LG are selling their washing machines in the U.S. at prices that are below the prices charged by American companies or below their cost of production.”

The U.S. government has twice found that Samsung and LG were selling in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. But Samsung and LG responded by “relocating their production facilities to other foreign countries in order to circumvent the U.S. government’s rulings,” Whirlpool says.

Whirlpool is a supporter of free and fair trade. According to company’s website, “We believe competition is healthy and breeds innovation. That’s why we support free and fair trade and promote an open global trading system that benefits our consumers, employees and the entire home appliance industry. Enforcing open, rules-based trade policies ensures the highest level of investment, innovation and choice for consumers around the world. Supporting free and fair trade increases industry access and incentivizes innovation globally, helping us to protect jobs and ensure continued innovation and investment in the appliance industry.”

Obama and Wyden supported the South Korea Trade Scam, and US citizen’s and now paying the price. Click on the following link for more on the story, whirlpool-files-complaint-samsung-lg-dump-washers-us–USA Today


Dozens of scientists on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Board of Scientific Counselors and board subcommittees have been informed that they will not be renewed for their roles advising the agency, the Washington Post reported.

The move, which would dismiss 38 of the 49 remaining subcommittee members, “effectively wipes out [the board] and leaves it free for a complete reappointment,” board executive committee chair Deborah Swackhamer told the Post. Representatives of corporate polluters and climate change deniers will likely be appointed to take their place.

Global warming denier Scott Pruitt heads the EPA. He is a staunch supporter of corporations right to pollute. He has always chosen corporate profits over the lives and health of US citizens. He’s also a keen supporter of exterminating the unborn in the womb via pollution, but only if corporate profits can be had in the process. This means the unborn are no better than number two on his list of important corporate objectives like ever increasing profits.

Advisory board members aren’t the only ones facing the end of their time at EPA: the agency also announced Tuesday plans to buy out more than 1,200 employees this summer.

This signals a troubling attitude toward the EPA’s scientific work, according to Ken Kimmell, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“By sacking dozens of scientific counselors, Pruitt (and by extension President Trump who appointed Pruitt to the post) is showing that he doesn’t value scientific input and the benefits it offers the public,” Kimmell said.

“The administrator has an important job to do, and this includes listening to the best independent science and to make decisions that protect our health, our safety and our environment. Instead, he’s delaying important public protections, denying the facts of climate change, and now, dismissing expert researchers who could help EPA do its best work. It’s appalling to see an administrator so directly attack the effectiveness of his own agency.”

Pruitt’s real job as EPA Administrator is to ensure corporate polluters can pollute even more regardless of the effects of this pollution on the citizens of the United States.

The activist corporate conservative justices have reinterpreted the US Constitution over the decades giving corporations all the legal rights and none of the responsibilities of real people, and then giving corporations free speech rights, which has then been used to roll back 100 years of campaign finance spending laws.

These conservative justices are not and never have been original intent jurists, as they claim. If anybody tells you the US Constitution is not a legal contract that is open to reinterpretation in a manner inconsistent with the desires of the founding fathers, they are wrong, and all you need to do is point to the modern conservative justices who represent only one economic class in the United States, and it isn’t the 99 percent (currently Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Samuel Alito and Anthony Kennedy).

Since Neil Gorsuch made his way to a supreme court seat earlier this year, I’ve been waiting for all to see that the Republicans who control the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, and the United States presidency will not under any circumstances come up with legislation banning abortions. That would give their base a lot of hope such legislation could withstand a challenge in front of the conservatively loaded US Supreme Court.

In addition, the US Republican-dominated US Senate will never vote to end the filibuster on legislation so that the conservatives in the Senate can disappoint their grassroots base again. That won’t happen because doing so would raise the hopes of the Republican faithful that their dreams of saving tens of thousands of the unborn every year would be fulfilled, and this great wedge issue would be legally resolved. Perhaps then many of the faithful would begin to clamor for a more equitable distribution of income, wealth, and political power, and the leadership cannot have that.

Ergo, conservatism, as it is largely practiced in the Republican Party, is only about letting corporations and the rich legally run wild over everybody else while redistributing income and wealth from the 99 to the 1 percent. But the Republican Party is not the only representative body in the US government who performs this function on behalf of the wealthy.

So too are corporate Democrats, such as Hillary and Bill Clinton, Wall Street Senators Ron Wyden and Joe Biden and many others.