Employees of a Target Store in Brooklyn, NY organized a labor union at a Target store, which was once considered impossible.
According to the Wall Street Journal:
“A group of less than a dozen pharmacy employees in Brooklyn, N.Y., passed the measure on Sept. 8 after the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) approved a request to conduct a vote.”
Target had argued against the vote, saying it shouldn’t have been allowed given the pending sale of the company’s pharmacy business to CVS Health for $1.9 billion. Target plans to appeal the NLRB’s decision to allow the vote, said spokeswoman Molly Snyder.
“Although we are disappointed by the results of the election, and believe that our team members do not need paid third-party representation, Target respects the rights of its team members to make this choice,” Ms. Snyder said.Target plans to appeal the NLRB’s decision to allow the vote, said spokeswoman Molly Snyder.”
Then Ms. Synder proceeded to say that Target plans to appeal the NLRB’s decision to allow the vote, said spokeswoman Molly Snyder.
“The union would be the first such group among Target’s nearly 350,000 employees. There have only been two votes to unionize at Target stores since 1990, according to Ms. Snyder: at Valley Stream, N.Y., in 2011, and in the Detroit area in 1990. Both were rejected.
The Brooklyn employees decided to pursue a union vote after CVS agreed to buy Target’s pharmacy business, according to a pharmacy employee at the location who asked not to be named. Staffers were worried about potential layoffs, reductions in their hourly wages or other labor changes after the CVS deal, the employee said.”
In other words, the employees were worried that part of their future income would be redistributed to CVS shareholders and or management compensation, or their lost future earnings would be applied toward paying for the purchase, or a combination of all. In effect, the employees were worried this purchase was an income redistribution scam.