Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘John G roberts’

The activist corporate conservative justices have reinterpreted the US Constitution over the decades giving corporations all the legal rights and none of the responsibilities of real people, and then giving corporations free speech rights, which has then been used to roll back 100 years of campaign finance spending laws.

These conservative justices are not and never have been original intent jurists, as they claim. If anybody tells you the US Constitution is not a legal contract that is open to reinterpretation in a manner inconsistent with the desires of the founding fathers, they are wrong, and all you need to do is point to the modern conservative justices who represent only one economic class in the United States, and it isn’t the 99 percent (currently Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Samuel Alito and Anthony Kennedy).

Since Neil Gorsuch made his way to a supreme court seat earlier this year, I’ve been waiting for all to see that the Republicans who control the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, and the United States presidency will not under any circumstances come up with legislation banning abortions. That would give their base a lot of hope such legislation could withstand a challenge in front of the conservatively loaded US Supreme Court.

In addition, the US Republican-dominated US Senate will never vote to end the filibuster on legislation so that the conservatives in the Senate can disappoint their grassroots base again. That won’t happen because doing so would raise the hopes of the Republican faithful that their dreams of saving tens of thousands of the unborn every year would be fulfilled, and this great wedge issue would be legally resolved. Perhaps then many of the faithful would begin to clamor for a more equitable distribution of income, wealth, and political power, and the leadership cannot have that.

Ergo, conservatism, as it is largely practiced in the Republican Party, is only about letting corporations and the rich legally run wild over everybody else while redistributing income and wealth from the 99 to the 1 percent. But the Republican Party is not the only representative body in the US government who performs this function on behalf of the wealthy.

So too are corporate Democrats, such as Hillary and Bill Clinton, Wall Street Senators Ron Wyden and Joe Biden and many others.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

The  Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The US constitution is clear on the NSA illegal spying program. Everybody knows the government is spying on everybody it wants to. Yet the corrupt corporate wing of the US Supreme Court (Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy) has ruled that each of us must prove that the government is spying on us personally before it will make a ruling that the government stop the program.

Apparently, the government can do any illegal, but well known, thing, and the court will rule in its favor, especially if it favors corporate profits over the constitution. And let’s face. There are tons of money being made off the program by corporate America. Edward Snowden was working for such a company when he informed us of the program.

Yet, the court could, if it be inclined, simply order the federal government to stop the program since its in violation of the constitution’s fourth amendment. Apparently, those corrupt conservative justices assume that the original intent of the founding fathers was that they didn’t mean it when they wrote the fourth amendment.

Read Full Post »